There’s

A war based on who’s right and who’s wrong when it comes to your child’s math education. Western countries such as the US and the UK fall far behind the Eastern powerhouses of China and Singapore when it comes to Math (did you see the US vs Them infographic I published recently?) and there’s a battle going on in Education circles around the world as to the best way to make sure your child will have the strong math skills needed to compete in the global economy.

The following quotes are from an interview at EducationNext.org with W. Stephen Wilson. Wurman, who was a U.S. Department of Education official and is coauthor with Sandra Stotsky of “Common Core’s Standards Still Don’t Make the Grade.”

There will always be people who think that calculators work just fine and there is no need to teach much arithmetic, thus making career decisions for 4th graders that the students should make for themselves in college. Downplaying the development of pencil and paper number sense might work for future shoppers, but doesn’t work for students headed for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields.

There will always be the anti-memorization crowd who think that learning the multiplication facts to the point of instant recall is bad for a student, perhaps believing that it means students can no longer understand them. Of course this permanently slows students down, plus it requires students to think about 3rd-grade mathematics when they are trying to solve a college-level problem.

There will always be the standard algorithm deniers, the first line of defense for those who are anti-standard algorithms being just deny they exist. Some seem to believe it is easier to teach “high-level critical thinking” than it is to teach the standard algorithms with understanding. The standard algorithms for adding, subtracting, multiplying, and dividing whole numbers are the only rich, powerful, beautiful theorems you can teach elementary school kids, and to deny kids these theorems is to leave kids unprepared. Avoiding hard mathematics with young students does not prepare them for hard mathematics when they are older.

There will always be people who believe that you do not understand mathematics if you cannot write a coherent essay about how you solved a problem, thus driving future STEM students away from mathematics at an early age. A fairness doctrine would require English language arts (ELA) students to write essays about the standard algorithms, thus also driving students away from ELA at an early age. The ability to communicate is NOT essential to understanding mathematics.

There will always be people who think that you must be able to solve problems in multiple ways. This is probably similar to thinking that it is important to teach creativity in mathematics in elementary school, as if such a thing were possible. Forget creativity; the truly rare student is the one who can solve straightforward problems in a straightforward way.

There will always be people who think that statistics and probability are more important than arithmetic and algebra, despite the fact that you can’t do statistics and probability without arithmetic and algebra and that you will never see a question about statistics or probability on a college placement exam, thus making statistics and probability irrelevant for college preparation.

There will always be people who think that teaching kids to “think like a mathematician,” whether they have met a mathematician or not, can be done independently of content….They are wrong. You learn Mathematical Practices just like the name implies; you practice mathematics with content.

There will always be people who think that teaching kids about geometric slides, flips, and turns is just as important as teaching them arithmetic. It isn’t. Ask any college math teacher.

Some brief additional points from the Maths Insider viewpoint:

- Calculators are great but without mental arithmetic fluency, kids won’t be able to spot mistakes made by pressing the wrong keys and finger counting does not equal arithmetic fluency
- Kids just need to know their times tables off pat as early as possible and definitely before they hit 11 years old.
- Although kids don’t need to be able to write mathematical essays, they should be able to talk with ease about the math in the world around them
- Children need to know early on that those cool careers they dream of (and the careers of the future) will likely need math

**I’m joining W. Stephen Wilson’s side in this Math Ed war. Whose side are you on?**

Good points! It is so frusterating to hear all the crazy ideas that people have about Math these days.

We homeschool our kids and so are able to teach our kids basic math and I have been enjoying seeing them excel in it. (My boys especially – my oldest daughter does fine but that is not her specialty).

Math is actually not an easy subject and only few people are really into it.. Sometimes kids are even getting bored with it.. We can learn new things together..

I enjoyed the quote from Mr Wilson. Straight to the point, take-no-prisoners, and not accepting flimsy, trendy arguments as replacements for pragmatic, sensible reasons for doing the mathematics properly from the beginning.

Caroline, I thought that your own thoughts at the end provided a needed balance; I was also a little uncomfortable at a couple of Wilson’s points. I think children should be able to communicate what they know and how, and I think that the ability to find different ways to solve a problem is one indication of mathematical ability.

I like what Mr Wilson is saying. Kids do need to learn their math facts and memorizing the multiplication tables will only prepare them for the higher levels of math required in higher years. But I disagree with Mikai. Math can be an easy subject if the basics are taught well. Some people take longer to learn, but once its learned and practiced it can become easy.